> Is the value of the weather channel that investors expect the national weather service to be abolished?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/11/25/weather-i...
"In 2017, Trump nominated Barry Myers, the former CEO of AccuWeather, a company that has advocated for the privatization of large parts of the National Weather Service, to lead NOAA. However, his nomination stalled, in part because of conflict-of-interest concerns since his family still owns the private forecasting company."
Myers doesn’t want to abolish the weather service, he wants to limit who gets the data they collect.
It certainly wouldn’t be profitable for Accuweather to have to do things like gather weather data and have supercomputers to analyze.
The value of these APIs is that they aggregate data worldwide. I don't want to write against the API of every national weather service in the world.
no, to clarify, apple has been using the weather channel (exclusively, i believe) for weather info across its ecosystem. you can't get integrated weather info on apple devices (iphone, watch, etc.) without it (you can download other apps but they wouldn't integrate with the OS).
i'd be super happy if they switched to the national weather service, but absent that, dark sky is more privacy preserving than the weather channel (who reportedly sell location data, for example).
Is the value of the weather channel that investors expect the national weather service to be abolished?