News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ARM-Ed Mac: We Have an Answer by skohan on Sunday March 22, 2020 @06:16PM (#22659250)
Honestly it's hard to imagine. Laptops are an incredibly important form factor.

I actually suspect the move to/inclusion of ARM in the macOS lines of product is part of the motivation behind dumping support for 32-bit apps in Catalina. By preemtively removing support for a large amount of legacy software, which will likely never be recompiled for ARM, they avoid the situation where their new machines appear much less capable than the old ones.

Re:ARM-Ed Mac: We Have an Answer by mrpippy on Monday March 23, 2020 @02:34AM (#22661745)
Exactly. By “clearing the deck” of all APIs (and software using them) that won’t make it to ARM, they can position it as the same OS and apps, just running on a more-efficient chip. And for 90+% of Catalina-compatible apps, a recompile is all that’s needed. (And/or they’ll have an emulator)
Re:ARM-Ed Mac: We Have an Answer by pjmlp on Monday March 23, 2020 @02:52AM (#22661799)
In the PC world, 2-1 like the Surface are taking over classical laptops.
Re:ARM-Ed Mac: We Have an Answer by wooger on Monday March 23, 2020 @07:42AM (#22663047)
Are they? Certainly not in sales.

There was a push to make all laptops have a touchscreen a few years back, but this seems to have fizzled out, and I've seldom seen anyone use them (deliberately anyway).

Re:ARM-Ed Mac: We Have an Answer by pjmlp on Monday March 23, 2020 @08:08AM (#22663214)
Here in Germany if you go to a local consumer shop, there aren't many classical laptops left to chose from.