You can't actually "punish" anyone on IG using voting, because as far as I can tell, you can't downvote.
Companies that sell products for the disabled are not 'discriminated against' by the pretty and able-bodied who don't buy their products by virtue of the fact they don't want them.
There are no hairs to be split here: discriminating against the disabled is reprehensible if not illegal, moderating against those who are 'poor or ugly' is at least reprehensible, and suppressing those who don't support the Chinese State is deeply problematic, though it might not be illegal, it should be, at least for users within non-Chinese jurisdictions wherein the can establish regulations concerning this.
To boot, if it can be demonstrated that TikTok receives direct or indirect state aid, then they're violating WTO rules [1].
[1] https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/statra_e/statrad.htm
This is of course not news as people in entertainment have always set impossible (and rather shallow and conventional) beauty standards, but I think apps like tiktok with their engagement drive it even faster.
You see a lot of discussions these days about dating behaviour on Tinder as well as people being obsessed with height in their profiles and whatnot, and we seriously have to wonder what this interaction through apps is doing to our social life.
Edit in response to commenter: Whataboutism is a Meme? It a logical failure and when used it should be dismissed since it highjacks the conversation which is about what tiktok did (which is different from what insta and friends do).
The whole point about whataboutism and how it got used politically is not that it's false. It's just used to distract and redirect conversation.
Only pointing out that finger pointing “whataboutism” isn’t popular here.