Alibaba has a lot of listings but most are middlemen. The underlying factory may or may not be able to produce what you want.
China probably has a surplus of ventilators now. Are our countries too proud to ask?
Huh. The idea is certainly around in the US, but I'm kind of surprised I can't think of a matching proverb.
We have a very close match, but it's considered a witty quote from a particular person (no consensus on who) -- "you miss 100% of the shots you don't take".
There's also something along the lines of "you can't get what you don't ask for". There's also an individually attributed version of this: "if you don't ask, you don't get". I had to look this up. There is no really common version.
And of course, there's "ninety percent of success is showing up". Again this is attributed -- quote trackers seem to agree that it should be "80%", not "90%". But this one is common enough that I could see it becoming a proverb eventually. On the other hand, this has gone somewhat afield from "if you don't shoot, you won't hit".
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/381542/what-was-...
I think it might be an old national (UK) lottery advertising slogan, but it's used generally and proverbially here anyway.
Who said that this consent had to be uninformed?
Helping create versions 3d printable or mass manufacturable could save countless lives.
The engineering effort that would go in to a successful maker-ish ventilator would surely be better utilized in other areas.
But what are you going to do when you or your loved one is assessed as likely to die without ventilation but denied because there isn't one available (or in the USA maybe they prioritise giving it to an insured patient instead).
There you/they are, sent home and told you/they are likely to die unless lucky.
Are you not going to try the cobbled together 3D printed option, even if it probably won't help?
Does that opinion still hold if you try it anyway and start to feel like breathing is better?
My strategy is far simpler. I have one elder to take care of who will be self-isolating for 3-6 months. Not getting sick is superior to relying on a nonexistent, failing medical system on the verge of collapse.
The open source ventilator efforts are well-meaning but have a high chance of being close to useless, especiallly without trained medics to go with them, and I agree with others that they might make things worse. We really do need to focus on preventing and reducing transmission first and foremost.
Unfortunately, there remains the question of what are you going to do if your loved one gets sick despite your best effort to prevent it.
The numbers around at the moment suggest there will still be too many of these happening for the hospitals.
Also, unfortunately, many vulnerable people don't have the realistic option to self-isolate.
For example anyone who lives in a cramped house-share and has an existing respiratory condition (asthma etc) is vulnerable, regardless of age, and cannot rely on self-isolation to stay safe unless everyone in the shared house isolates as well. Which they will not.
There are a lot of people in that kind of situation.
Similarly anyone who has a vulnerable partner, in a place that has no spare room for them to isolate in, and at least one of you still has to go out to work to pay for rent and food.
Not getting sick is by far the best option, and preventing transmission is by far the most important thing to do. But unfortunately, we have to explore all realistic alternatives for when that doesn't work, even if those alternatives are a bit desparate and may not help.
One possibility that may be of intermediate use is efforts at building kit that hospitals might be able to use when the proper kit has run out. In that situation there will be trained medics but insufficient equipment. I'm not sure but I think it plausible that an open source ventilator project, especially a well-run one, might be able to help in that sitution.