The US has run less than 10k in total. That is a colossal failure.
Question claim in fact, although it is persistently being repeated everywhere constantly, for propaganda purposes. Three of the major private lab companies indicate they'll be at a 10,000 combined per day test capacity before the week is out.
The US doesn't know how many tests have been run in total nationally. A large volume of tests have been distributed to hospitals and private labs around the US, the majority of which do not report their numbers back to a central authority (such as the CDC). That's a failure of centralized reporting and organization, due to the US having dozens of separate healthcare systems which the Feds do not control.
State infectious disease registries are absolutely receiving ELRs (electronic lab reports) and transmitting case reporting back to CDC and data is currently moving for novel coronavirus as well.
The term you are looking for is NEDSS/NETSS reporting.
> Today, all 50 states and Washington, D.C., use NEDSS-compatible integrated surveillance information systems to send case notifications to NNDSS.
So you think we should celebrate that after a month to get ready, we'll have finally caught up with a country 1/7 our size in testing capacity?
The US is currently testing the smallest percentage of its population of any developed nation: https://twitter.com/nick_kapur/status/1238156462708477958
China, too, if you can trust their numbers, and South Korea's look positive after a big starting spike. Each of these countries took early (except for China, but they shut down Wuhan with fewer cases than the US has now), aggressive steps that should be considered a model for others.
No, it probably doesn't. It probably reflects the fact that we're not finding folks, because we're not testing enough.
Ohio's (Republican, incidentally) governor, for example, is stating that their five confirmed cases likely indicate 100,000 undetected in the community so far: https://twitter.com/GovMikeDeWine/status/1238177953126604801
If you don't think that affects how our numbers net out, I'm not sure we can have a rational discussion beyond here.
> In terms of per capita testing, Korea has run 3,600 tests per 1 million population. In contrast, U.S. has just run five tests per 1 million people.