Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?
by dukoid on Sunday March 08, 2020 @11:36AM
(#22518514)
In France the rubber tyre lobby is so strong, the got them on subway cars. No joke: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber-tyred_metro
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?
by pyrale on Sunday March 08, 2020 @11:55AM
(#22518659)
The subway has tires for technical reasons. Stations in the Paris subway are close enough that better acceleration times have a significant impact on travel time and peak-hour capacity.
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?
by derefr on Sunday March 08, 2020 @12:20PM
(#22518831)
If they were willing to retool, you’d think they’d just go with a maglev monorail design. Those have the capacity for the instantaneous acceleration of a railgun.
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?
by DFHippie on Sunday March 08, 2020 @12:25PM
(#22518869)
That would be a pretty rough ride. I wouldn't want to be a straphanger on one of those. The turns would be uncomfortable as well in a railgun railway car.
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?
by roywiggins on Sunday March 08, 2020 @12:36PM
(#22518935)
It would also be useless, the stations are so dense that you would barely increase the average speed.
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?
by derefr on Sunday March 08, 2020 @01:42PM
(#22519334)
I didn’t mean to suggest you’d use it as a railgun. It just has the capacity for exactly as much torque as you need from it at any given moment.