News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions? by abyssin on Sunday March 08, 2020 @10:40AM (#22518236)
I remember a hitchhiking ride in France with a man working in the building and infrastructure industry telling me about these figures, and the intense lobbying against transporting goods on rails...
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions? by dukoid on Sunday March 08, 2020 @11:36AM (#22518514)
In France the rubber tyre lobby is so strong, the got them on subway cars. No joke: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber-tyred_metro
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions? by pyrale on Sunday March 08, 2020 @11:55AM (#22518659)
The subway has tires for technical reasons. Stations in the Paris subway are close enough that better acceleration times have a significant impact on travel time and peak-hour capacity.
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions? by derefr on Sunday March 08, 2020 @12:20PM (#22518831)
If they were willing to retool, you’d think they’d just go with a maglev monorail design. Those have the capacity for the instantaneous acceleration of a railgun.
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions? by DFHippie on Sunday March 08, 2020 @12:25PM (#22518869)
That would be a pretty rough ride. I wouldn't want to be a straphanger on one of those. The turns would be uncomfortable as well in a railgun railway car.
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions? by roywiggins on Sunday March 08, 2020 @12:36PM (#22518935)
It would also be useless, the stations are so dense that you would barely increase the average speed.
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions? by derefr on Sunday March 08, 2020 @01:42PM (#22519334)
I didn’t mean to suggest you’d use it as a railgun. It just has the capacity for exactly as much torque as you need from it at any given moment.
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions? by forkexec on Sunday March 08, 2020 @11:55AM (#22518657)
At Michelin, we're more than just Green guides, we put our tires on the subway cars and encourage protesters to use ours for all their tire fire needs.
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions? by tomohawk on Sunday March 08, 2020 @12:40PM (#22518954)
Maybe the study should also take into account this use of tyres.
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions? by Sam777666 on Sunday March 08, 2020 @01:16PM (#22519180)
In January there was this report: Microscopic pieces of plastic have been discovered in the most remote locations, from the depths of the ocean to Arctic ice. Another place that plastic is appearing is inside our bodies. We’re breathing microplastic, eating it and drinking plastic-infused water every day.Plastic does not biodegrade. Instead, it breaks down into smaller pieces, and ultimately ends up everywhere, including in the food chain. Pieces that are less than five millimeters in length, around the size of a sesame seed, are called “microplastics.” https://graphics.reuters.com/ENVIRONMENT-PLASTIC/0100B4TF2MQ...
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions? by hef19898 on Sunday March 08, 2020 @04:33PM (#22520411)
On Germany the best lobby work to put transportation on truck instead of rail is done by DB, German Railroads, with their freight services. Compared to trucking you can easily double lead times, increase costs per ton and decrease trackability and reliability.
Re:Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions? by kungtotte on Monday March 09, 2020 @04:13AM (#22523794)
Same thing in Sweden.

Lower costs for the customers and higher reliability when you ship by truck means rail is not really a consideration even though it would be better for everyone if it actually worked.