Re:Assange Hearing Day 2
by fit2rule on Wednesday February 26, 2020 @08:04AM
(#22422513)
How credible is a rape case when the police themselves admitted to altering the reports of the accusers to fit the narrative given to them?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
That is pretty curious.
“police officer IK, who had formally questioned SW on 20 August 2010, modified and replaced the content of SW’s original statement in the police database, upon instruction of her superior officer MG and without consulting SW.”
https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadPublic... (The report itself)
Is that not tampering with evidence? If true, I'd expect some serious investigation into this.
Yes. The "ohchr.org" is the "Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights". I would imagine that's enough weight to warrant a local inquiry.
[1] https://www.republik.ch/2020/01/31/nils-melzer-about-wikilea...
A source for that statement.