News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Usenet – Let's Return to Public Spaces by dredmorbius on Friday February 14, 2020 @01:03AM (#22324305)
In large part agreed.

People see Usenet and the wide-open access to all. What they fail to see, especially for its crucial first formative decade (1980-1990) was the very formidable gates that did exist: institutional access through selective research universities, and a handful of tech firms and government agencies.

It was a bit like Disneyland's legendary E-Ticket -- once inside the gates you could wander freely and sample at will. But there was a price to be paid to enter: technical ability, inclination, and most of all access to the institutions. Those institutions also provided a brake on some of the worse forms of abusive behaviour -- individuals could be identified, sanctioned, and removed from the system. The small number of site administrators (initially literally a handful, later still capable of fitting within a single conference room or lecture hall) also reflected a balance of centralisation and decentralisation which seemed to mostly work.

Much of what was good and bad about Usenet derived from these gatekeepers, and that is a point very often missed in subsequent treatments or discussions.

Re:Usenet – Let's Return to Public Spaces by jfalcon on Friday February 14, 2020 @05:23PM (#22330986)
Don't forget that Usenet itself has its own safeguards as in the news.admins and the newsgroup moderators should that particular newsgroup have it enabled.

Otherwise, it was and still is the wild west in terms of content and quality.