News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by bdcravens on Thursday February 13, 2020 @07:03PM (#22322644)
Since all of his music is R&Bish auto-tuned, not that hard for a computer to generate that sound. (I have to admit, I've hit the "get off my lawn" phase, missing the "good ole days" of "real music" ie 90's hip hop)
Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by dropoutcoder on Thursday February 13, 2020 @07:21PM (#22322752)
The irony being that the 90’s hip hop sound was largely influenced by MPC60/3000 quantization, amongst other drum machines.
Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by djmips on Thursday February 13, 2020 @09:44PM (#22323563)
Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by sdinsn on Thursday February 13, 2020 @07:16PM (#22322722)
They generated the lyrics and melodies using AI. Everything else was done by a person, including the vocals.
Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by wwright on Thursday February 13, 2020 @07:24PM (#22322768)
Do you have a link on that? I can’t find it in the HN link.
Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by squeaky-clean on Thursday February 13, 2020 @07:37PM (#22322857)
The Adweek source linked goes into a little more about it, but not much. Specifically mentioning a model was used for lyrics first, then the AI created a melodic and percussive arrangement. It doesn't say much more about how it was done.

I found another article that states they had a real human voice sing the lyrics (then auto-tuned it to Scott's style), but there's no actual sources here, or on any other articles I can find.

https://musebycl.io/digital-data/agency-used-ai-make-travis-...

Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by wwright on Thursday February 13, 2020 @07:46PM (#22322907)
I did follow through to Adweek, but given that it is Adweek and not NME, I wasn’t sure how literally to take the word “arrangement” there :-) Thanks!
Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by sdinsn on Thursday February 13, 2020 @07:36PM (#22322845)
See the adweek article that was linked in OP's article, it has more details. The AI part was only lyrics, melodies, and percussion arrangements; not actually the production itself.
Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by bdcravens on Thursday February 13, 2020 @07:29PM (#22322799)
I didn't get that from the article.
Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by sdinsn on Thursday February 13, 2020 @07:36PM (#22322842)
See the adweek article that was linked in OP's article, it has more details. The AI part was only lyrics, melodies, and percussion arrangements; not actually the production itself.
Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by monkeyfacebag on Thursday February 13, 2020 @07:08PM (#22322676)
I'm not clear what you mean. How does auto-tune make it easier for the computer to generate?
Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by PeterisP on Thursday February 13, 2020 @07:17PM (#22322725)
Computer generated voice has certain artifacts that makes it a bit distinctive. Auto-tuned natural voice has similar artifacts, so if an artist uses auto-tune, then there's less noticeable difference between their real (computer-altered) voice and a fake computer-generated voice.

A more exaggerated example would be artists that use a vocoder (e.g. Daft Punk or something like that), which would be even easier to synthesise convincingly because the real vocals are also mostly synthesised.

Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by mirimir on Thursday February 13, 2020 @08:53PM (#22323318)
Or VibeSquaD.

(not UK Vibe Squad)

Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by bdcravens on Thursday February 13, 2020 @07:22PM (#22322757)
Less "uncanny valley" affect, because in both cases, you're hearing a synthesized voice.
Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by scollet on Thursday February 13, 2020 @07:56PM (#22322974)
I can't parse this comment. What is "R&Bish"? Why does that matter that it's easy? What makes 90's hip-hop "real" or implicitly superior to the last two decades?
Re:Deepfake version of Travis Scott by chestervonwinch on Thursday February 13, 2020 @08:24PM (#22323144)
R&B: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhythm_and_blues

ish: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/ish

So, having an aesthetic similar to rhythm and blues.