News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel axes Nervana just two months after launch by xyzzy2020 on Tuesday February 04, 2020 @07:19PM (#22242674)
100% agreed. We might have been on the same team. Don't forget Omnipath and Xeon Phi. Prediction: this new discrete graphics card as well.
Re:Intel axes Nervana just two months after launch by porker on Wednesday February 05, 2020 @02:11AM (#22244665)
I sat through a Xeon Phi presentation at university, about how it would revolutionize the university's "supercomputer". I left shortly after; did Phi come to nothing?
Re:Intel axes Nervana just two months after launch by pinewurst on Wednesday February 05, 2020 @12:46PM (#22249223)
It was too difficult to get decent performance from Xeon Phi for general use cases. A few apps could make it work e.g. PGS bought up all the old stock for a big geophysics system.
Re:Intel axes Nervana just two months after launch by shaklee3 on Wednesday February 05, 2020 @01:00AM (#22244388)
Omnipath went the way infiniband is going. Ethernet has caught up, and surpassed the speeds, so using proprietary technology with fewer features isn't that attractive anymore.
Re:Intel axes Nervana just two months after launch by sitkack on Wednesday February 05, 2020 @01:15AM (#22244430)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terabit_Ethernet is faster than the main memory bandwidth on current generation processors.
Re:Intel axes Nervana just two months after launch by vardump on Wednesday February 05, 2020 @03:07AM (#22244885)
But not faster than L3 cache bandwidth. Some cards can DMA to L3 cache. Granted, eventually it's flushed to main RAM, so might not help too much in the end.
Re:Intel axes Nervana just two months after launch by sitkack on Wednesday February 05, 2020 @10:22PM (#22253182)
Cool. That means it both prevents nethammer and allows the cpu to check a signature/decrypt/type check as value stream over the network.