News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Congrats! Web scraping is legal! (US precedent) by TrackerFF on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @09:38AM (#22180929)
I can understand why some do not want scrapers - increased traffic (with practically zero benefits to the owners) is one obvious reason.

(Some people will then say "But why not just offer APIs", but that's a lot of extra work and maintenance).

It's like with instagram and other social media platforms. The content creators put in the hard work, while the leeches are stealing content for their own benefit, giving zero credits to the original content creators.

Re:Congrats! Web scraping is legal! (US precedent) by xnyan on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @09:41AM (#22180960)
There’s a very effective way out, don’t your data on the public web.
Re:Congrats! Web scraping is legal! (US precedent) by kerkeslager on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @09:50AM (#22181098)
[decided to delete because I misunderstood the context]
Re:Congrats! Web scraping is legal! (US precedent) by ppseafield on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @10:04AM (#22181256)
Let's not conflate a) a person's personal data, and b) a business's dataset. The GP and the article are clearly referring to the latter. Preventing web scraping won't protect users from businesses collecting their data.
Re:Congrats! Web scraping is legal! (US precedent) by buboard on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @10:00AM (#22181200)
Instagram is not the content creator tho
Re:Congrats! Web scraping is legal! (US precedent) by TrackerFF on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @10:47AM (#22181777)
What I'm trying to say is: For every popular content creator on IG, there are tens and hundreds of (more or less automatic) content curators that do nothing more than scrape content with lots of likes, and re-post on their own channels. Then when they get sufficient followers, they make money through paid product placements, account flipping, pay-to-play sharing, and what not. More often than not, there's no linking to the original pages / creators.