News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Machine Unlearning by seek3r00 on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @02:41AM (#22178337)
I know it’s probably a stupid question but: why not just anonymising the data?
Re:Machine Unlearning by JorgeGT on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @04:30AM (#22178835)
Anonymising data is surprisingly difficult. I'm wondering if there is the "falsehoods programmers believe about" about this, as there are for topics such as names, addresses, time, etc.?
Re:Machine Unlearning by amelius on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @06:29AM (#22179432)
Re:Machine Unlearning by dschooh on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @03:31AM (#22178544)
Two quick thoughts: Some data is inherently non-anonymous, like face images. Data that is now anonymous may be de-anonymized in the future.
Re:Machine Unlearning by nopeless on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @05:04AM (#22179008)
All human-produced data is inherently non-anonymous.

The only respectful mechanical way to use it is through information-theoretic guarantees, e.g. using it for zero-knowledge proofs and then burning the data.

Re:Machine Unlearning by abhs on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @03:24AM (#22178511)
De-anonymising is possible because of the data via direct or indirect correlations.
Re:Machine Unlearning by jorgemf on Wednesday January 29, 2020 @05:53AM (#22179238)
Sometimes the data is an image of your face and you don't want it to be used for any algorithm, regardless it has your name associated to it or not