News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:5/3nm Wars Begin by wolf550e on Saturday January 25, 2020 @02:12PM (#22147998)
It's still a marketing term that has nothing to do with specific feature sizes, but they do increase density from one node to another.

https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/5_nm_lithography_process

Re:5/3nm Wars Begin by dwaltrip on Saturday January 25, 2020 @02:31PM (#22148119)
How are the numbers chosen if they don't correspond to any actual measurement?
Re:5/3nm Wars Begin by ip26 on Saturday January 25, 2020 @03:20PM (#22148407)
Well, the old law was that density doubled with each node. Indeed, you can see that e.g. from TSMC7 to TSMC5, density roughly doubled, regardless what happened with minimum feature size.
Re:5/3nm Wars Begin by wolf550e on Saturday January 25, 2020 @02:40PM (#22148173)
Like the numbers in product names, only with the understanding that smaller is better.
Re:5/3nm Wars Begin by blp on Saturday January 25, 2020 @03:43PM (#22148507)
It is an equivalent scale. Density is fine pitchm2 pitchtrack height. You scal node by an equivalent reduction.

It would be better to use logic density, but it is easier to use numbers we are used to.

Re:5/3nm Wars Begin by Rexxar on Saturday January 25, 2020 @07:44PM (#22149636)
They divide by sqrt(2) and round to an integer.
Re:5/3nm Wars Begin by wmf on Saturday January 25, 2020 @07:36PM (#22149606)
The numbers are a factor of the square root of 2 since that reduces area by 2.