News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rolls-Royce plans mini nuclear reactors by 2029 by papreclip on Friday January 24, 2020 @11:44AM (#22139878)
I think space colonization is an even bigger fantasy than relying on "future tech" that will magically terraform the earth and reverse climate change. We can have a tiny structure housing 10 or 20 people somewhere in our solar system for the price of millions of pounds of fuel and billions of dollars.

Inter-system travel will never happen. Forums like this tend to have a healthy population of the sci-fi minded, so it won't be a popular opinion here, but the laws of physics simply rule it out. And the "men once thought they couldn't fly" argument doesn't carry water with me. We know a lot more about what we don't know now than we did then

Re:Rolls-Royce plans mini nuclear reactors by 2029 by htfu on Friday January 24, 2020 @02:59PM (#22141878)
Nevermind the hocus pocus, and I agree as far as "travel", but all that's really needed for (fairly dystopian attempts at) space colonization is surely artificial wombs?

Which aren't far off.

We don't need to break the laws of physics, or have cryonics or singularity shit work out to eventually consume the universe. All the nodes will just be real isolated.

Re:Rolls-Royce plans mini nuclear reactors by 2029 by ryacko on Friday January 24, 2020 @12:09PM (#22140190)
Space colonization is only viable for a small handful of people who produce at least a million dollars in revenue per year.

Programmers and CEOs.