"While Qt held that promise, it was a long way from the maturity (10+ years) that .NET provides."
What? Qt 3.0 is even older than .NET.
Funny.
I'm frequently saying that .NET 1.1 (and java) is just VCL(Delphi) with virtual machine.
My friend corrects me: In his opinion delegates came from QT.
Re:What is the future of Qt?
by archangel_one on Sunday February 13, 2011 @07:21PM
(#2214636)
And .NET 1.0 came out in 2002, which isn't even 10 years ago yet.
Adoption of .NET will still allow C++ development for people with those skills and inclinations while not adding any more complexity than exists. More importantly .NET will allow more flexibility going forward - even reusing existing VB code or writing new code in F# or IronPython. Qt was not the future for mobile app development because of the relatively high barrier to entry imposed by C++ for casual app developers and enterprise IT departments.