There are apocryphal stories of studies purporting to find that the best performing investment accounts are those that belong to people who are either dead or had forgotten about their account:
* https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-the-buy-and-play-dead-...
* https://twocents.lifehacker.com/the-best-investors-literally...
Generally, even if one invested lump sums right at market peaks, just before crashes, you'd still get a decent returns as long money was not withdrawn:
* https://awealthofcommonsense.com/2014/02/worlds-worst-market...
Though the best strategy for most people seems to be to just put away a little every money in a total market passive index fund:
* https://ofdollarsanddata.com/even-god-couldnt-beat-dollar-co...
I believe that the purpose for homeownership in the US was primarily to foster a competitive housing environment. That way landlords wouldn't control the majority of the housing market and people could help keep housing prices down per month by being able to have the ability to qualify for housing just as easily as tenancy.
On the flip side, it also makes it harder to sell when it is booming.
The potential return is intrinsically higher from 0 to 1 for PE, than it is from 1 to N in public markets
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-04-18/privat...
Build more housing? Build more land? One-child policy?
Or were you talking about just shooting people?
In addition, we have affordable margin loans, mortgage interest tax deduction, property tax deduction to juice the system, not to mention additional legsilation like 1031 exchanges, prop13, etc.
Many of these were put in place as public policy promoting homeownership driven by the idea that homeownership would be less costly / beneficial to society compared to long term tenancy. That thought doesn’t seem to necessarily be wrong per se. but if you help out demand side legislatively while restricting supply legislatively, sometimes you’ll get cases of imbalance like we see in the coastal cities.
Given what we’ve observed in the last couple of decades around the world, a managed system like Singapore where property appreciates at a ~2% rate a year (and if demand suddenly shoots up, they’ll add transfer taxes or stamp duties or inject supply into the market) seems much more stable for society.