News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Robot tanks: On patrol but not allowed to shoot by eeZah7Ux on Tuesday January 21, 2020 @07:11AM (#22106213)
> I'm pretty excited that something from the universe of Ghost in the Shell would become reality

Pretty excited?

Cyberpunk was always intended as a dire warning of the looming dystopian future.

And urge people to rebel to it. It literally has "punk" in its name.

It's a bit sad to see how it's been flipped on its head.

Re:Robot tanks: On patrol but not allowed to shoot by A_Parr on Tuesday January 21, 2020 @10:11AM (#22107559)
GITS is largely post-cyberpunk, but dips into cyberpunk for ideas. Mostly for it's antagonists. The cyberpunk driver of the post-cyberpunk tank being an interesting take on things, at least.

Clarification for those who don't know. Cyberpunk spun off of a bunch of genres that call themselves $name-punk but ironically ignore the -punk aspect and just replace $name for the name of the technology they replaced magic with in what's otherwise a fantasy story. (Including literally magic as technology.) Because cyberpunk was taken, the cyber version of $name-punk ended up being called post-cyberpunk instead of cyber-steampunk for whatever reason.

Re:Robot tanks: On patrol but not allowed to shoot by eeZah7Ux on Tuesday January 21, 2020 @12:24PM (#22109017)
> GITS is largely post-cyberpunk, but dips into cyberpunk for ideas

This does not negate the dire warnings of cyberpunk both as a genre and GITS itself.

This thread is about robot tanks built by the military-industral complex. Everything else is besides the point.

> Mostly for it's antagonists

*its

Re:Robot tanks: On patrol but not allowed to shoot by tjchear on Tuesday January 21, 2020 @10:18PM (#22114272)
Excited in the way that the big robots we read so much about in stories become real, but I don't wish for the world in which those death machines become a necessity turn into reality.