News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft’s quest to go ‘carbon negative’ inspires $1B fund by vnorilo on Friday January 17, 2020 @07:12AM (#22073979)
Carbon tax is a great idea, and I would support a proposal such as yours.

However, I am afraid it is not a question of implementation, but of dealing with vested interests.

Re:Microsoft’s quest to go ‘carbon negative’ inspires $1B fund by mlrtime on Friday January 17, 2020 @07:44AM (#22074105)
Cabon and other "sin" taxes are a great way to influence change. However we should be lowering income and property taxes at the same time to help with these vested interests.
Re:Microsoft’s quest to go ‘carbon negative’ inspires $1B fund by frandroid on Friday January 17, 2020 @08:29AM (#22074416)
That's what BC did. Its ideologically conservative government at the time introduced a carbon tax going into general revenues, and lowered general taxes, so that the carbon tax is revenue-neutral.
Re:Microsoft’s quest to go ‘carbon negative’ inspires $1B fund by ttul on Friday January 17, 2020 @09:52AM (#22075032)
An alarm bell goes off any time someone suggests lowering PROPERTY taxes... ugh. Property taxes should be way higher in most parts of the world to disincentivized speculation.
Re:Microsoft’s quest to go ‘carbon negative’ inspires $1B fund by JoeAltmaier on Friday January 17, 2020 @09:54AM (#22075051)
Yeah my local town removed property tax for new development. In fact, they instituted a TIF (tax incentive fund?) which means the developer gets the property taxes free and clear for new buildings. The city is going broke, but the council is dominated by developer-sponsored shills so its hard to fix.
Re:Microsoft’s quest to go ‘carbon negative’ inspires $1B fund by papreclip on Friday January 17, 2020 @02:40PM (#22078365)
lower the taxes for primary residence only, then
Re:Microsoft’s quest to go ‘carbon negative’ inspires $1B fund by labawi on Monday January 20, 2020 @04:37PM (#22102277)
As has been said. Evenly distribute tax to the people, basic income style. They will be better off, problem solved.
Re:Microsoft’s quest to go ‘carbon negative’ inspires $1B fund by cyborgx7 on Friday January 17, 2020 @07:50AM (#22074137)
> However we should be lowering income and property taxes at the same time to help with these vested interests.

What makes you think they need to allow a carbon tax for that? They seem to be doing fairly well at lowering those how they want to without any concessions?

Re:Microsoft’s quest to go ‘carbon negative’ inspires $1B fund by eru on Friday January 17, 2020 @07:19AM (#22074007)
Yes. Unfortunately it's much easier to get supported for green boondoggles that cost the government a lot of money for little gain; than for a money-spinning carbon tax.
Re:Microsoft’s quest to go ‘carbon negative’ inspires $1B fund by Gsnds on Friday January 17, 2020 @08:29AM (#22074411)
Yes, More Taxes, truly the magical elixir of the modern era
Re:Microsoft’s quest to go ‘carbon negative’ inspires $1B fund by scotty79 on Friday January 17, 2020 @09:02AM (#22074644)
Do you have a better idea how to convey the information about true cost of action to the market? You can't let it assume the cost is 0 like it did for last 200 years.
Re:Microsoft’s quest to go ‘carbon negative’ inspires $1B fund by misun78 on Friday January 17, 2020 @11:18AM (#22075937)
As others have suggested, a corresponding decrease in income and corporate tax such that you get a revenue neutral framework with no additional wasteful government spending would be supported by many, including those on the right. This may also have an additional effect on neutralizing any downwards economic impact from the carbon taxation.