Re:How The New York Times Verified the Iran Missile-Strike F...
by lolc on Thursday January 16, 2020 @10:03AM
(#22065115)
How would the target know it was locked upon?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How The New York Times Verified the Iran Missile-Strike F...
by jaywalk on Thursday January 16, 2020 @01:43PM
(#22067525)
By seeing a constant high-energy radar signal, which would distinguish it from surveillance radar.
Re:How The New York Times Verified the Iran Missile-Strike F...
by Chris2048 on Thursday January 16, 2020 @10:54AM
(#22065635)
That's my point. Maybe a notification protocol? Seems to be used as a warning sometimes..
Re:How The New York Times Verified the Iran Missile-Strike F...
by saberdancer on Thursday January 16, 2020 @04:56PM
(#22069445)
Others have already commented, but normal surveillance radar is like a spotlight from the tower. It goes around and scans the area. If they determine that you are important, the radar can "lock on" to you which means that it will no longer scan around but would shine the light on you constantly.
If they want to shoot at you, they turn on another even stronger more focused light to improve accuracy.
Military today have ability to detect enemy targetting radars and when they lock on so having such a thing in SciFi does not seem strange to me.
Re:How The New York Times Verified the Iran Missile-Strike F...
by lolc on Thursday January 16, 2020 @04:01PM
(#22068875)
Ah sorry I misunderstood your comment. I thought you wanted to say it was obvious for the target to know. Haha yes a notification protocol would be a weird thing to have. It would be gamed the millisecond things went beyond friendly warnings.
Re:How The New York Times Verified the Iran Missile-Strike F...
by magduf on Thursday January 16, 2020 @11:04AM
(#22065767)
The same way they do now: by detecting whatever the attacker is using to sense and target them. Today, that's usually radar. In sci-fi, maybe it's tachyon beams or something.