Re:A low-mass planet candidate orbiting Proxima Centauri
by robin_reala on Thursday January 16, 2020 @02:55AM
(#22062474)
Not in person, but it would be an interesting target for Breakthrough Starshot.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A low-mass planet candidate orbiting Proxima Centauri
by unlit_spark on Thursday January 16, 2020 @04:08AM
(#22062833)
Didn't know about about this project but I read more in the past hour and it seems reachable. Too bad it already has a destination. Hope I live to see the message it comes back from this.
Re:A low-mass planet candidate orbiting Proxima Centauri
by iamgopal on Thursday January 16, 2020 @03:01AM
(#22062501)
some novel much have been written about two civilisations multiple light years apart, communicating using messages that have latency of years...any examples ?
Re:A low-mass planet candidate orbiting Proxima Centauri
by semi-extrinsic on Thursday January 16, 2020 @04:01AM
(#22062792)
I'm currently reading the Engines of Light trilogy by Ken MacLeod. In that universe, there is no FTL travel nor communication, but starships can travel literally at the speed of light. There are "spheres of influence" spanning some tens of lightyears, and the information delay between worlds is indeed a plot element.
Re:A low-mass planet candidate orbiting Proxima Centauri
by m4rtink on Thursday January 16, 2020 @05:29AM
(#22063262)
Many collonial empires worked with such latency before trains, steam ships, telegraph and wireless comunication became available.
Re:A low-mass planet candidate orbiting Proxima Centauri
by lmm on Thursday January 16, 2020 @03:27AM
(#22062620)
Vernor Vinge predicted a future galactic usenet - unreliable messages that might take a while to arrive, or need to go via multiple possible paths, are what usenet was built for.