News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by joefourier on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @08:05AM (#22053824)
I've only heard of this happening in the US and Canada. Outside of North America, everyone uses Whatsapp, which supports group messaging on every platform. I'd be curious to know why it hasn't penetrated into those countries.
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by teekert on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @08:12AM (#22053854)
I think it has to do with the fact that the US (and Canada) very early on had unlimited texting plans, and iMessage would make use of that (iPhones just send texts for iMessages in absence of a data connection). WhatsApp can only use data, which is cheaper and used to be unlimited (that's gone) in the EU. In contrast, texting was and still is insanely expensive in the EU (per byte it is staggering even, compared to normal data). Since data coverage was poor in the US in the 2G days (is this true? In the EU 2G was GPRS, meaning available when normal voice was available... I think it differs for US networks?) and texting was often included in a subscription, iMessage made a lot if sense and was very reliable.

I remember early iPhone users complaining here in the EU that their iPhone unpredictably would sent iMessages either for free over wifi or for 50ct/message over sms/text (us EU citizens avoid sms/texting like the plague, allthough unlimited plans are now more commonplace, it's just too late). I recently set Signal to deal with my sms/text messages. Boy was that an expensive mistake when I accidentally texted my friend in Curacao instead of sending a normal Signal message.

Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by simias on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @08:59AM (#22054138)
>WhatsApp can only use data, which is cheaper and used to be unlimited (that's gone) in the EU. In contrast, texting was and still is insanely expensive in the EU (per byte it is staggering even, compared to normal data).

You need to specify where in the EU, because it doesn't mirror my experience in France for instance. Data used to be very expensive while there were no shortages of plans with near-unlimited texts. It also isn't the case in many other countries in the world in my experience. AFAIK the advantage of WhatsApp over plain texts isn't that it's cheaper per-se, it's that it works over wi-fi which means that as long as you find a hotspot anywhere in the world you can use it. No need to worry about roaming fees, no need to worry about how many texts or MB of data are in your plan.

Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by teekert on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @10:15AM (#22054852)
In the Netherlands 10 euro for truly unlimited was commonplace. I held on to that plan from 2011 until last year, when they decide I couldn't have 4G and unlimited data.
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by viklove on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @11:29AM (#22055613)
You really don't need to specify where in the EU, because there are vastly more people in France communicating regularly with people in other neighboring countries. If you need to specify where in the EU, then you need to specify where in the US as well, because France is about the size of a single US state.

Americans mostly talk to other Americans, who also have unlimited texting plans. French people are probably talking to people who live in Belgium, Germany, the UK, Spain, etc. who will all encourage them to use WhatsApp.

Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by pjc50 on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @10:06AM (#22054735)
Texting plans got huge allowances early on in the UK. I don't remember ever seeing unlimited data plans. However, the thing that was really expensive was "multimedia" messages (MMS), and occasionally you'd generate one of these by mistake by including an emoji in an SMS then suddenly be charged a whole pound for it.

International texting is expensive though, while it's free in Whatsapp. Which is why it took off among various diasporas.

Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by jwr on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @09:49AM (#22054575)
> texting was and still is insanely expensive in the EU

In Poland at least, SMS costs 0 in almost all plans.

As for WhatsApp, I try to keep people away from it and show them Signal, as I do not trust Facebook with any of my data.

Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by titanomachy on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @10:20AM (#22054909)
Poland has unusually cheap and good cell service, at least in the parts of the country I've visited.
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by irrationalactor on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @05:46PM (#22059656)
Whatsapp's dominance everywhere outside the US has nothing to do with the generous texting plans here. These were common all over Europe as well. The reason the US has been slower to transition to data-based texting is due to our size and the rarity of Americans traveling internationally.

Imagine if every state in the US was a different country. That's basically Europe. Say you got charged roaming fees every time you traveled from New York to Connecticut. This was true in Europe until they passed regulation that mandated compatibility.

Wi-fi had no roaming upcharge. Hence why texting that works over wi-fi became the default.

Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by stubish on Thursday January 16, 2020 @03:56AM (#22062763)
It is also that the penetration of iPhones is not as high in many regions. WhatsApp, WeChat, Line are all dominant in places, especially in regions where your peer group can't all afford a $300 phone. And people don't switch to the more limited iMessage when they do become wealthier, or when cheap second hand iPhones become common.
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by avip on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @08:15AM (#22053862)
WA solves a problem that doesn't exist if all your contacts use an iphone.

And it hadn't exactly "not penetrated" NA, there are probably tens of millions of users. But it's definitely not "the default mode of communication" as in Brazil or India (+ lots of other countries).

Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by ubermonkey on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @08:59AM (#22054141)
I won't use it because of who owns it (Facebook).
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by stjohnswarts on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @03:56PM (#22058448)
Because iphone is bigger here and I assume you understand momentum and iphone exercising their oligopolistic practices of keeping people on their brand entirely rather than opening up their iMessage protocol. I don't know about your country, but in the USA it pretty much takes the federal government to take on one of the biggest companies in the world.
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by swebs on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @08:25AM (#22053920)
I don't really know anyone that uses Whatsapp in Finland. Most of my friends use Telegram these days.
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by asutekku on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @08:33AM (#22053965)
Literally everyone outside of tech bubble.

In the university i’m affiliated with and the companies i’ve worked with, only IT people use Telegram. Everyone else still defaults to whatsapp.

Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by skinkestek on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @09:56AM (#22054647)
Another datapoint, from Norway:

Everyone of my closest friends use Telegram. I share a number of groups with 300-400 people (family, extended family, organizations I belong to/contribute to etc).

Last time I got a message on WhatsApp was from an ex-colleague 2 years ago or something. With my new phone I didn't even bother installing it.

That said: none of my current colleagues (in tech) uses Telegram or WhatsApp for that matter.

Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by savolai on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @08:56AM (#22054114)
I live in Helsinki. Literally everyone +1. I don't know anyone preferring telegram.
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by stjohnswarts on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @03:57PM (#22058478)
Telegram has been criticized over and over for home grown encryption by people I consider experts so I skip it and stick with Signal.
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by anoncake on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @09:27AM (#22054365)
Good for you but the problem still exists for other people.
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by Hello71 on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @10:46AM (#22055211)
It has not been my experience that everybody in China uses WhatsApp.
Re:Apple’s “monopsony” power, and the woman who named it by cforrester on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @11:16AM (#22055490)
Do you suppose they mostly use WeChat there?