Re:Cable Haunt: A critical vulnerability found in cable modems
by MaxBarraclough on Monday January 13, 2020 @02:52PM
(#22037927)
> You become vulnerable for all sorts of MITM attacks. The attacker now also has access to your LAN, which is usually trusted by all devices on it.
Good points; these two issues are quite different.
You could stop the network-access problem by putting an extra router (a secure one) between the modem and your local network, but that wouldn't save you from MITM.
Re:Cable Haunt: A critical vulnerability found in cable modems
by pixl97 on Monday January 13, 2020 @07:06AM
(#22033695)
You mean you're not using end to end certificate based encryption for all your applications these days?
And all the pushback we get from people here that DoH/DoT is a bad thing.
Re:Cable Haunt: A critical vulnerability found in cable modems
by satanspastaroll on Monday January 13, 2020 @07:27AM
(#22033828)
Not all applications are, and there are specific automated downgrade attacks for encrypted comms that force some back to plaintext. Giving outsiders access to your internal network is rarely a good idea.
Re:Cable Haunt: A critical vulnerability found in cable modems
by iso1631 on Monday January 13, 2020 @07:23AM
(#22033800)
You're implying we shouldn't bother with firewalls
Re:Cable Haunt: A critical vulnerability found in cable modems
by MaxBarraclough on Monday January 13, 2020 @02:55PM
(#22037958)
It's not my applications, but applications that auto-update over unencrypted HTTP. Also, IoT devices with software built by the lowest bidder.
Re:Cable Haunt: A critical vulnerability found in cable modems
by big_chungus on Monday January 13, 2020 @07:33AM
(#22033857)
Many or most devices don't support this and the average consumer isn't capable of doing it himself.
No, if your modem gets owned, you are in a whole lot of trouble.
You become vulnerable for all sorts of MITM attacks. The attacker now also has access to your LAN, which is usually trusted by all devices on it.