See eg "shirtgate" where an astronomer was castigated by feminists for wearing a shirt with skimpily clad figures, on the basis that it was offensive to women. Ironically, the shirt had been given to him by a feminist woman friend who thought it was liberating.
> Ok, let's call that puritan values of abrahamic religions.
Opposition to bad language is a feature of every society with more than one social class, which is all civilized societies and a lot of uncivilized ones.
"Shooter" is a word that's acceptable to use in almost any company, even though the verb at it's root part of some abhorrent acts.
"Fuck" is a distasteful word for an act with near-universal approval.
Near-universal approval and near-universal distaste. A curious phenomenon, isn't it?
"making love" is something partners do as a healthy and (re)productive part of their relationship, "fucking" is what 'animals' do, purely done for pleasure. It is a bad word for the same reason gluttony, excessive alcohol and drugs are a sin. A society where everyone mindlessly chases dopamine from carnal pleasures is less productive, especially when this leads to unrest and violence (and I guess that's where forced sex comes into play).
This reasoning is inconsistent with the rejection of "Cummings."