News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Women now make up the majority of the U.S. labor force by ChuckNorris89 on Friday January 10, 2020 @03:09PM (#22014895)
>many men can have children in their 70s

Just because you can have an erection and produce sperm at 70 doesn't mean you can have children and if you do they'll most likely suffer from down syndrome or other conditions.

Having kids after 45 as a male carries risks for the children as well.

Re:Women now make up the majority of the U.S. labor force by cmdshiftf4 on Friday January 10, 2020 @03:21PM (#22015056)
>if you do they'll most likely suffer from down syndrome

Please cite something for this assertion or delete it, as it is not in line with anything I've read on the matter.

Increased paternal age carries some potential for increased side effects for their children, but it is absolutely nowhere near the risks involved in a delayed pregnancy for women [0].

[0]https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/07/well/family/older-fathers...

Re:Women now make up the majority of the U.S. labor force by blacksmith_tb on Friday January 10, 2020 @03:47PM (#22015366)
Though there's some biological risk[1], it seems obvious the real problem is that you'll be dead before your kid is in college (and I am skeptical about how involved you could be in parenting before that...)

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternal_age_effect

Re:Women now make up the majority of the U.S. labor force by ewindal on Friday January 10, 2020 @04:13PM (#22015599)
> they'll most likely suffer from down syndrome or other conditions

An order of magnitude higher chance of genetic defects isn’t very significant when the initial risk is less than .1%