News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linux doesn't have Photoshop by faceplanted on Saturday December 28, 2019 @05:21PM (#21902214)
Noob question, why is CMYK editing different from any other kind of editing? You can convert rgb to CMYK, every printer does it, so what's actually missing?
Re:Linux doesn't have Photoshop by omnimus on Saturday December 28, 2019 @07:05PM (#21902780)
Well you want to see what you are doing. RGB shows more colors than you can print. Theoreticaly when if you have cmyk profile from your printer and calibrated monitor you should see somehow accurate representation of how will things get printed.
Re:Linux doesn't have Photoshop by wtracy on Saturday December 28, 2019 @05:25PM (#21902236)
Not a color expert, but every color encoding scheme is going to have a slightly different gamut. Meaning, CMYK can encode colors that RGB can't, and vice-versa.
Re:Linux doesn't have Photoshop by zozbot234 on Saturday December 28, 2019 @05:29PM (#21902253)
Negative color values can be used to cleanly represent colors outside the standard gamut. But I'm not sure that CMYK even has anything like a standard gamut associated with it - so the details of that "conversion" might depend on what the CMYK data is for.