Re:Categories of deep recommendation systems
by kevinwang on Saturday December 28, 2019 @01:27PM
(#21900660)
The “that” being left out makes it tough to parse
Re:Categories of deep recommendation systems
by 15__characters on Saturday December 28, 2019 @01:34PM
(#21900704)
The "to" missing at the end totally breaks it for me, I read it as "Categories of Deep Recommendation Systems: Researchers Should Pay Attention"
Re:Categories of deep recommendation systems
by thaumasiotes on Saturday December 28, 2019 @02:39PM
(#21901189)
Omitting the "that" is fully standard English grammar. Omitting the "to" is not, and radically alters the meaning of the title.
Probably too long to fit, op did a decent job of compressing imo.
The original is:
RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM SERIES PART 2: THE 10 CATEGORIES OF DEEP RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS THAT ACADEMIC RESEARCHERS SHOULD PAY ATTENTION TO