Categories of deep recommendation systems

Re:Categories of deep recommendation systems by sidpatil on Saturday December 28, 2019 @01:08PM (#21900517)

The article's original title is much more readable than this post's title.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Categories of deep recommendation systems by ajflores1604 on Saturday December 28, 2019 @01:18PM (#21900598)

> The article's original title is much more readable than this post's title.

Probably too long to fit, op did a decent job of compressing imo.

The original is:

RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM SERIES PART 2: THE 10 CATEGORIES OF DEEP RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS THAT ACADEMIC RESEARCHERS SHOULD PAY ATTENTION TO

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Categories of deep recommendation systems by kevinwang on Saturday December 28, 2019 @01:27PM (#21900660)

The “that” being left out makes it tough to parse

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Categories of deep recommendation systems by 15__characters on Saturday December 28, 2019 @01:34PM (#21900704)

The "to" missing at the end totally breaks it for me, I read it as "Categories of Deep Recommendation Systems: Researchers Should Pay Attention"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Categories of deep recommendation systems by thaumasiotes on Saturday December 28, 2019 @02:39PM (#21901189)

Omitting the "that" is fully standard English grammar. Omitting the "to" is not, and radically alters the meaning of the title.

[ Parent | on HN ]