Re:Why we Forked Firefox and Not Chromium
by tyingq on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @11:15AM
(#21826331)
Ah, that's good news then. I am somewhat worried about the Chrome monoculture with Edge going that direction and Chrome marketshare continuing to grow.
Re:Why we Forked Firefox and Not Chromium
by Dolores12 on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @11:27AM
(#21826476)
Vivaldi reports itself as Chrome now, making Chrome numbers even higher
Re:Why we Forked Firefox and Not Chromium
by The_rationalist on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @12:34PM
(#21827187)
Firefox will eventually die in 5 to 10 years if the marketshare trend continue.
Firefox for Android already has a negligible number of users and as a consequence webmasters stopped to worry about making their mobile websites compatible with the limitations of Firefox.
Re:Why we Forked Firefox and Not Chromium
by staplers on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @01:13PM
(#21827563)
I would reckon a lot of those statistics are based on analytics rather than polling.
In which case Firefox blocks a lot of trackers so naturally their marketshare appears less than reality.
Re:Why we Forked Firefox and Not Chromium
by The_rationalist on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @03:07PM
(#21828838)
Adblock plus + uBlock == 6.5 millions of users for Firefox.
While this is not nothing, this should be a few 0.x % of global browser marketshare
Re:Why we Forked Firefox and Not Chromium
by input_sh on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @04:02PM
(#21829420)
Firefox blocks trackers by default, no need for an add-on.
IIRC though the main issue with YouTube was a slow polyfill library which has been fixed since they updated to the standardized version of Shadow DOM.