Re:Unbearable news
by lawn on Sunday December 15, 2019 @03:56PM
(#21798915)
I don't understand why paying for single articles isn't more popular. It's the same for streaming services: I should be able to pay for that one TV-series I want to watch, or that one movie that's only available on that one streaming service I don't have.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Unbearable news
by mynameisvlad on Sunday December 15, 2019 @04:03PM
(#21798956)
I mean, you can do the latter already. You can buy a season or a single episode of a show on iTunes, Amazon, etc. You can also rent or buy single movies across many different platforms.
It’s just absurdly expensive compared to a streaming service. This is partly due to legacy pricing (I don’t think the price of a movie or TV show has gone down in many years, and all the providers charge the same) but also because I’m sure a lot of revenue for subscription services comes from people who buy the subscription but don’t use the service.
Transactions (micro or not) have wall-time, monetary and psychological overhead. If you split this among dozens of items and providers it only gets worse.
Paying per article may make sense for in-depth analysis, investigative journalism and other large pieces. But for the daily news it's probably just too small a unit.
Re:Unbearable news
by fiddlerwoaroof on Sunday December 15, 2019 @04:20PM
(#21799079)
There is Blendle, which I find pretty nice: it’s like 25¢ per article and you put money into an account ahead of time.