News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We Only Hire the Trendiest (2016) by pc86 on Thursday December 12, 2019 @05:51PM (#21777480)
> Many/most developers are prohibited from working on open source projects by their employers.

This is 100% untrue. IP assignment is not enforceable if you do work on your own time and use your own equipment (including connectivity).

If you don't own a personal computer and your GitHub page is loaded with commits during your working hours, yeah you're going to have a hard time arguing it's not company IP. But for the vast majority of developers this is a complete non-issue, and insinuating the contrary is just FUD.

Re:We Only Hire the Trendiest (2016) by perl4ever on Thursday December 12, 2019 @09:41PM (#21778716)
"Many/most" is ambiguous. "Many" is 100% true, and having a different experience isn't any kind of a challenge to that.

Even if there's some question as to the theoretical legal enforceability of an agreement, if you have to sign it to have a job, then it's not practical to challenge it. You'd have to have the resources for litigation as well as to make a living after being blacklisted.

It is true that people ignore their agreements (about IP, not to run a side business, etc) when they think the company will never notice. That's still a meaningful risk that exists that some day they will.

Re:We Only Hire the Trendiest (2016) by nullc on Friday December 13, 2019 @04:19AM (#21780228)
Re:We Only Hire the Trendiest (2016) by vonmoltke on Friday December 13, 2019 @08:04AM (#21781166)
This thread started with "In any state besides California and Illinois", so California state code is irrelevant.

Also, posting bare links as replies is annoying. Please add some context.