Re:Oxide Computer Company: Initial boot sequence
by malvosenior on Monday December 02, 2019 @01:57PM
(#21685553)
It's one of my highest upvoted comments ever with 250 points. Not sure why it dropped to the bottom so fast.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Oxide Computer Company: Initial boot sequence
by gfosco on Monday December 02, 2019 @02:19PM
(#21685792)
It immediately went from #1 to like #15 behind comments that obviously do not have a lot of votes. Take a guess why. HN fuckery afoot as usual.
Re:Oxide Computer Company: Initial boot sequence
by dang on Tuesday December 03, 2019 @03:20AM
(#21690758)
We downweight bilious comments, especially at the top of threads. Why? Because the internet tendency is to make everything ill-tempered, peevish, and gross. The spirit of this site is curiosity (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) and for that to have breathing space, there needs to be an active counterweight.
The main thing to understand is that it's a global optimization, not something stupid like supporting particular PR campaigns.
Re:Oxide Computer Company: Initial boot sequence
by gfosco on Tuesday December 03, 2019 @03:58AM
(#21690923)
That's very fair and I apologize for the snark.
Re:Oxide Computer Company: Initial boot sequence
by mkl on Monday December 02, 2019 @03:38PM
(#21686608)
There's a strong recency component to the comment ordering. New comments get a boost so they are visible enough to get upvotes if they deserve them, and over time the order settles.
Re:Oxide Computer Company: Initial boot sequence
by malvosenior on Monday December 02, 2019 @02:47PM
(#21686093)
It's just more signal not to use whatever they end up producing. Whether it was an astroturf campaign or they used personal connections to get HN to re-rank things, it doesn't speak well to transparency, honesty or being customer-centric. I think my original comment was a very valid criticism of vaporware and vanity blog posts used in lieu of actual product information. Trying to sweep that under the rug is not a good look.