News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Battle Chess by grimgrin on Sunday November 24, 2019 @06:20PM (#21624215)
re: strange chess variants

I scooped up a handful of Knightmare Chess decks when I saw 'em really cheap. Still haven't tried, but the idea of a chess variant with physical cards that Do Things to the game, sounded very interesting

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knightmare_Chess

Re:Battle Chess by jtolmar on Sunday November 24, 2019 @08:03PM (#21624671)
I came up with a great chess variant ages ago, and finally got around to making a computer version of it last week.

Implied Chess:

Rule 1: Chess

Rule 2: You can't capture normally

Rule 3: Any piece threatened by two enemy pieces is captured (except kings)

Rule 4: The player who just moved captures first

Rule 5: No En Passant (it just doesn't make sense)

Rule 6: Check and checkmate are normal

http://noisyowl.com/chess/

Re:Battle Chess by xashor on Sunday November 24, 2019 @10:39PM (#21625268)
That's quite fun (especially chain-capturing!), can't beat Alpha Beta 3 yet. Any reasons for Rule 6?
Re:Battle Chess by jtolmar on Sunday November 24, 2019 @11:38PM (#21625508)
Thanks!

Check and checkmate are normal because it's just way too hard to checkmate the king with dual threats.

I can't beat Alpha Beta 3 yet either. If anyone starts beating 4 I'll put some effort into optimizing the search so it can go deeper. Going 10 ply deep is pretty standard for a chess engine, so it's pretty embarrassing for humanity that nobody is beating the 3-ply setting. I think this game actually favors computers over humans more than regular chess does.