> faster on average
What kind-of time measurements? What kind-of average?
This chart shows some time measurements:
https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...
:and the geometric mean is faster for the C++ programs, but the median seems faster for the rust programs.
Statistical artifacts?
Re:Clang Format Tanks Performance
by steveklabnik on Friday November 22, 2019 @10:52AM
(#21606659)
> What kind-of time measurements? What kind-of average?
I interpreted the parent to mean a simple average, so I did exactly that: calculated the percentage for each, and averaged them. In the colloquial term, "mean".
typo ? "the colloquial term" is "average", the specific term is "mean".
Re:Clang Format Tanks Performance
by The_rationalist on Friday November 22, 2019 @06:16PM
(#21611132)
Geometric mean is the implicit default measurement for benchmarking
That does not show it's 10% slower on average; it shows that C++ is 0.9917938291x as fast as Rust. They both have some where they win by 30%, most are closer, Rust is just faster on average.
> But they use llvm instead of gcc for c++,
C++ g++ g++ (Ubuntu 9.2.1-9ubuntu2) 9.2.1 20191008
?
> gcc is in average 20% faster than clang.
Extremely citation needed.