News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PG&E to intentionally shut off power again – this time to... by conistonwater on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @12:39PM (#21586218)
Elsewhere in the thread somebody linked to the court order (http://s1.q4cdn.com/880135780/files/doc_downloads/2019/Alsup...), and I don't see how this explanation can possibly be correct.

In particular, (a) PG&E has a history of falsifying inspection reports, (b) PG&E must keep power lines clear of trees, (c) the power lines can't arc during high winds, (d) because of the history of falsified inspections PG&E must re-inspect things. These terms don't seem particularly onerous, especially with respect to making power lines safe during high winds---I assume that's the sort of thing every energy company does already anyway. In particular, what do you mean, in this context, when you say "best-in-class industry practises"?

Re:PG&E to intentionally shut off power again – this time to... by Blackstone4 on Wednesday November 20, 2019 @12:57PM (#21586429)
Note I said, "if". I was refering to the law and what would be the implications even if they maintain best-in-class industry practises.

This wasn't so much a statement about PG&E as it was about CA law.