News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Google Squeeze by whywhywhywhy on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @12:19PM (#21515864)
Image Search has also been completely ruined by their push for ML based results without even checking if it's better.

Years ago I could Image Search a frame of a film and get the film title almost every time, now I get a generic "Street" or "Man" search term and then a bunch of photos that have streets in them with a similar color palette which are never from the film.

They've got so excited by the tech that they can identify an object or setting that they've forgotten just finding the same image elsewhere online and using the context of the web page would give a better answer.

Re:The Google Squeeze by rainburg on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @01:05PM (#21516399)
Luckily, there's an alternative: images.yandex.com

It effortlessly does both reverse image search AND image objects search. Results are usually so good, it almost seems like Google decided to cripple their image search on purpose.

Re:The Google Squeeze by wilkystyle on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @01:11PM (#21516459)
The fact that Yandex includes the OCR'd text in any image you search from is awesome.
Re:The Google Squeeze by buboard on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @01:31PM (#21516654)
I use yandex images so often that it triggers their bot filter. I think they 've found themselves a high-potential niche here.
Re:The Google Squeeze by enraged_camel on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @02:06PM (#21517035)
If there's one party I'd be even less comfortable sharing my data with than Google, it would be a Russian company. Not because I think Russians are evil or anything, but rather because there's even less accountability and oversight (if any at all) with what they do with that data than we have in the US/Europe.
Re:The Google Squeeze by ehsankia on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @12:29PM (#21515980)
That's specifically reverse image search, I find that image search itself has gotten much better at generic search terms.

I agree that the generic results on reverse search are annoying, but my guess is that it isn't replacing exact results, but rather giving you something when there would've been no results at all. If you search for an exact frame that does exist, it usually finds it correctly.

Re:The Google Squeeze by buboard on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @01:21PM (#21516560)
much better at serving pinterest pages and stock image sites ... maybe
Re:The Google Squeeze by altec3 on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @01:39PM (#21516740)
Google Search for DIY project images: Get 90% Pinterest results that end up just linking to a random machine generated page with garbage text and a few tangentially related pictures.

Google Search for someones Instagram handle: Get one Instagram result and endless pages of sites that scrape Instagram and have the person's profile interspersed with ads.

Re:The Google Squeeze by atombender on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @04:49PM (#21518547)
Try Bing's image search. It's actually very good. Bigger previews, ability to easily download, smart ML-driven similarity search (you can even draw a rectangle of an image to find something similar to that area), better at suggesting related images, nicer UI overall. The mobile app is also much nicer than Google's when it comes to images.
Re:The Google Squeeze by pottertheotter on Tuesday November 12, 2019 @08:42PM (#21520373)
I switched over to Bing a couple months ago because Google's image search now shows very tiny previews on the right side of the screen. They're often barely bigger than the image I click on. Been using Google since 1999, but I guess I look at images enough it pushed me over.