Re:Xerox Considers Takeover Offer for HP
by tonyedgecombe on Wednesday November 06, 2019 @03:20AM
(#21460637)
Especially when that 20% might supplant the 40% business.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Xerox Considers Takeover Offer for HP
by jacobush on Wednesday November 06, 2019 @04:08AM
(#21460847)
Kodak knew and they tried, but they misread how fast the transition would go. They thought there would be a period for hybrid film/digital devices, for instance.
Re:Xerox Considers Takeover Offer for HP
by agumonkey on Wednesday November 06, 2019 @09:27AM
(#21462873)
They "knew" after shelving prototypes 10 years prior. They only reacted which is too hard.
Company success is often about judging timing... too early or too late == death both cases. Super hard to do.
Re:Xerox Considers Takeover Offer for HP
by simonh on Wednesday November 06, 2019 @09:57AM
(#21463171)
Exactly, General Magic is a classic example of too early. The technology of the time was simply incapable of supporting their vision.
Re:Xerox Considers Takeover Offer for HP
by agumonkey on Wednesday November 06, 2019 @10:19AM
(#21463382)
Not even to that extent. Some people propped indie open source dvd-ready built-in arcade emulator consoles in the 2Ks, and it bombed. The machine was alright, but the market was just not ripe. Look at all the classic mini consoles milking money recently.
Re:Xerox Considers Takeover Offer for HP
by tonyedgecombe on Wednesday November 06, 2019 @04:50AM
(#21461067)
It's hard to criticise Kodak because they really were pioneers in the early days of digital photography.
Re:Xerox Considers Takeover Offer for HP
by pedrocr on Wednesday November 06, 2019 @05:40AM
(#21461297)
The Innovator's Dilemma covers that too though. It's usually the case that the incumbent does invent the disruptive technology. Actually selling it in scale ends up not happening and often the eventual winner is actually formed by old employees of the incumbent who see the opportunity and can't get the organization to move on it, so they form a new one. To me that was the most amazing part of the book, that the barrier wasn't the technology itself, it was all incentives/politics/etc that made it not work.