Re:New type of black holes – Non interacting low-mass black ...
by greglindahl on Thursday October 31, 2019 @06:05PM
(#21414233)
In the case of WIMPs, the authors thought the name was funny, and published several conference posters before trying to publish in ApJ. The editor of ApJ normally rejects cute names, but let this one through because it was already in the literature. He regretted that decision when the MACHO paper arrived...
Re:New type of black holes – Non interacting low-mass black ...
by pas on Thursday October 31, 2019 @05:22PM
(#21413824)
Someone writes a paper using the terminology, others refer to it, and it sticks.
Re:New type of black holes – Non interacting low-mass black ...
by willis936 on Thursday October 31, 2019 @05:56PM
(#21414134)
Considering "weakly interacting" is already a very stuck name.
By most accounts these are typical black holes, which do not interact weakly, let alone not at all. I don't think this name will stick.
Re:New type of black holes – Non interacting low-mass black ...
by greglindahl on Thursday October 31, 2019 @06:08PM
(#21414263)
"quiescent" is already in wide use referring to black holes, and "quiescent" appears in the 2nd paragraph of this paper. Some stellar binary systems are called "interacting".
I find the name interesting since, mini black holes are one hypothesis concerning Dark Matter, and also Weakly Interacting Massive Particles. Google also doesn't seem like Non-interacting black holes are common nomenclature. How do these names get created?