News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zuckerberg doubles down on Facebook political ads policy ... by rayiner on Thursday October 31, 2019 @02:02PM (#21411751)
While Facebook is obviously not bound by the first amendment, the fact that something is paid doesn’t undermine its nature as free speech. Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense,” which sparked the American Revolution, was published and sold for profit. https://www.printmag.com/editors-picks/power-of-print-common.... (Though Paine donated his share to the Continental Army.)

Paine got his message out by contracting with for-profit publishers to disseminate his book. Facebook is just the new version of that.

Re:Zuckerberg doubles down on Facebook political ads policy ... by harryh on Thursday October 31, 2019 @03:47PM (#21412888)
I think there is a pretty clear difference between publishers which sell speech to people that want to buy it and advertisers that take money in return for putting speech in front of people automatically.

Maybe both forms of money entangled speech are worthy of the same protections. But they are two different things.

Re:Zuckerberg doubles down on Facebook political ads policy ... by shawndrost on Thursday October 31, 2019 @04:07PM (#21413135)
As I understand the function of a publisher, it is predominantly about marketing and distribution, and putting a book in front of people who otherwise wouldn't have heard of it or bought it.
Re:Zuckerberg doubles down on Facebook political ads policy ... by harryh on Thursday October 31, 2019 @09:48PM (#21415622)
Yes, but publishers just give people the opportunity to buy something.

Advertisers put the speech in front of people whether they want to buy it or not.