News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:JavaScript Is C by ylyn on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @06:57AM (#21385731)
The author isn't claiming that someone claimed that either.

S/he's just saying that s/he likes Rust/Elm because they check more invariants than C/TypeScript.

In other words, "no one said it does" isn't really a useful response to "I don't like X as much as Y because X doesn't do A but Y does."

Re:JavaScript Is C by yoz-y on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @09:01AM (#21386609)
They might not claim that but the article’s title and gist still is “JavaScript is C because of this one reason”. This kind of comparison is just not useful.
Re:JavaScript Is C by bovermyer on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @09:31AM (#21386879)
I disagree. It changed how I think about JavaScript a little. As such, it was useful for me.

Be mindful that you do not mistake what we think for how we think.

Re:JavaScript Is C by yoz-y on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @10:13AM (#21387365)
I think the point the article makes is good, I just don't like how the comparison was made. I don't think the article would be of less value if the author dropped the "JavaScript is C" peppered all around it.
Re:JavaScript Is C by chriskrycho on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @10:32AM (#21387562)
It's a fair point. That's the trick with a blog post where you're basically "thinking out loud." This is just the way that the little switch flipped in my head as I was thinking through things that day: The experience felt very similar.
Re:JavaScript Is C by CathedralBorrow on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @11:40AM (#21388393)
Is there a difference between "I don't like this" and "This is not useful"?
Re:JavaScript Is C by yoz-y on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @12:29PM (#21389008)
There is. But in this particular case I stand by my point, a cursory glance will show that JavaScript is nothing like C. Starting an article with such a premise and re-stating it repeatedly smells like clickbait to me. Also it devaluates the point made by the article which is actually good.
Re:JavaScript Is C by fwip on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @12:08PM (#21388726)
You can just use "they."
[dead]
Re:JavaScript Is C by gatherhunterer on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @09:58AM (#21387205)
It is still considered incorrect by many. Some but not all dictionaries and style guides have adopted “they” and “them” as singular gender-ambiguous pronouns.
Re:JavaScript Is C by Bantros on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @09:20AM (#21386766)
It only took one hour
Re:JavaScript Is C by t0astbread on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @09:44AM (#21387039)
Yeah and that's good
Re:JavaScript Is C by manthedudeguy on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @08:18AM (#21386270)
Or just pick he or she. Not a big deal.
Re:JavaScript Is C by adamsea on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @10:33AM (#21387572)
Like she, manthedudeguy, said, its not a big deal ;)
Re:JavaScript Is C by manthedudeguy on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @12:23PM (#21388922)
I agree with Adam here, she gets it.
[dead]
Re:JavaScript Is C by astura on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @08:58AM (#21386576)
Chris is commonly both a male and female name (is a diminutive of Christopher, Christine, Christina, Christian, and probably others).
Re:JavaScript Is C by slacka on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @10:05AM (#21387278)
Then use "they" or if you're really that concerned with making a mistake, spend 2 seconds to google them, and you will see that this Chris is a "He" from the first hit on a google of "Chris Krycho".

https://twitter.com/chriskrycho?lang=en

Re:JavaScript Is C by manthedudeguy on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @12:24PM (#21388947)
The point of my post is that one shouldn't be "that concerned with making a mistake", so once again, choose any. It is not a big deal.
Re:JavaScript Is C by toastal on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @08:54AM (#21386542)
Chris is a fairly gender neutral name. Just say 'they'; it's in the dictionary now for gender neutrality so no reason not to.
Re:JavaScript Is C by bovermyer on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @09:29AM (#21386859)
The article, nor Chris's website itself, does not give any indication to his gender.

However, he is a co-host on the podcast "Winning Slowly," and that website refers to him as a "he."

Re:JavaScript Is C by GordonS on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @08:53AM (#21386532)
Chris could be a male or female name, so not terribly helpful in this case.
Re:JavaScript Is C by Koshkin on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @09:01AM (#21386607)
There's also the issue of gender identity.
Re:JavaScript Is C by devin on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @09:00AM (#21386596)
The name “Chris” is unisex.