It's a nightmare, don't go down this path.

So much is broken, and backing out is a bigger nightmare.

Here's me failing to get a G Suite to act like a Google Account, and then figuring out just what I can migrate back to Gmail: https://medium.com/@buro9/one-account-all-of-google-4d292906...

Somehow though, I have managed to get 2TB of photo storage for free. The photos are there in full quality, but do not count to storage usage.

If you're brave, there's a path here to unlimited free photo storage.

I would not advise anyone to use G Suite for a personal email address.

>> There is no advertising in the G Suite Core Services, and we have no plans to change this in the future. Google does not collect, scan or use data in G Suite Core Services for advertising purposes. [1]

To me that reads a lot like 'Google does indeed collect, scan, use, read, algorithmically process, mine, analyze, characterize, handle, refine, derive from, and peruse data in G Suite Core Services, but with the primary purpose of doing other stuff with it than direct advertising.'

Sorry, if that's actually not fair this time, but with all the doublespeak about these things for the last decade and a half or so, hedging like that does not inspire confidence.

Of course they do. Users expect spam filtering, search, and a bunch of other things that require processing.

Yep, that was exactly my take as well. The statement from Google sounds good at a glance, but absolutely leaves open the possibility that they use the data for 100 other things that aren't _directly_ related to advertisement targeting, but that users might be concerned about.

Your use of "primary" paints in a worse light than it really is. From the quote it sounds like they don't use it period for advertising

I'm inclined to think I just added some honesty. When they've used it in their 'research and development to better understand your preferences and offer you better services' or whatnot, do you seriously believe that isn't to interact with ad targeting and all the other ways they use the models?

That crosses into personal attack. Please follow the site guidelines.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Did I ask you for an amateur shrink evaluation?

Aspersions aside you have a point about the risk for confirmation bias, but that goes for conserving overly credulous attitudes as well. Everyone can make up their own minds about how to fill the blanks in how Google really handles this data but the track record isn't great for straightforward honesty there.

Currently. And no current plans to change in the future. But they could change their plans. It's not a "no advertising as long as you keep paying", it's "no advertising as long as we feel like it."

> for advertising purposes

That qualifier leaves a lot open. Without client-side encryption it's just words.

Well, yeah, there's spam detection and similar features that are enabled by not having client-side encryption. If all of the features that are enabled by cloud-based email aren't worth it to you, fine, but most people like them and you have other options.

The “you have other options” closing is unproductive, but I concur that there are plenty of valid (useful) reasons to analyze customer data. Additional features: phishing and virus detection, suspicious account activity, building private search indexes, cataloging photos by vision results, and using user feedback to correct models.

Hmm, I will need to do a bit more research into this.

My only concern is what exactly is the extent of "G Suite Core Services", does that apply to all existing features of Google, the entire entity itself including YouTube/etc, or just the services provided by the G Suite.

I still may do this but if it doesn't include search, YT, etc, it will be a bit disappointing knowing they are double dipping with my subscription and data.

Google Search and YouTube are outside of G Suite, and will still track the user.

> for advertising purposes.

You got it right there. All other purposed are fair game.