News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Coca-Cola Undermines Plastic Recycling Efforts by mindslight on Sunday October 20, 2019 @12:34PM (#21305178)
Bottle/can deposits predated curbside recycling, and vestigial regulations don't just disappear. Some large liquor stores specialize in making returning cans as easy as possible, to attract business from alcoholics.

FWIW have you done the math on the actual money you get back, divided by the time spent managing an extra waste stream? Unless you're a heavy bottle user, I personally don't see how it makes sense to not just ignore the deposit and recycle via modern means.

Re:How Coca-Cola Undermines Plastic Recycling Efforts by agent86 on Sunday October 20, 2019 @04:20PM (#21306816)
I haven't done real calculations, but on the whole this is pretty low impact and doesn't require much extra effort or any special trips.

We rinse the bottles/cans whenever we are doing other dishes. We throw them into a bin that holds all deposit eligible containers. When the bin fills we take it with us on our next trip to the grocery store and recycle them.

It probably takes me about 5 minutes to feed them all in and it recovers about 3 dollars.

These days I get it in change and then give it to my daughter for her piggy bank. She's very young, but we're trying to introduce the concepts of saving early.

Re:How Coca-Cola Undermines Plastic Recycling Efforts by Symbiote on Sunday October 20, 2019 @07:37PM (#21308107)
I found out that in Denmark, drink containers can only be made from fresh plastic, or recycled plastic from drinks containers, or appropriate food grade plastic waste (eg from the food packaging factory).

The general plastic recycling is considered too contaminated to be used for food.

Knowing this, I give my bottles to the people who collect the deposits. (I don't wish to do it myself.)

Re:How Coca-Cola Undermines Plastic Recycling Efforts by WalterBright on Sunday October 20, 2019 @03:34PM (#21306489)
> I personally don't see how it makes sense to not just ignore the deposit and recycle via modern means.

There's a psychological effect. For example, the grocery store charges 5 cents per bag. If I forget to bring bags with me to the store, it irks me that I have to pay 5 cents, even though the amount is trivial and completely non-substantive.

Re:How Coca-Cola Undermines Plastic Recycling Efforts by mindslight on Sunday October 20, 2019 @04:04PM (#21306700)
But do you travel back home to retrieve your own bags?
Re:How Coca-Cola Undermines Plastic Recycling Efforts by quantum_magpie on Monday October 21, 2019 @12:03AM (#21309268)
When I leave my backpack at home and realize I need to visit the grocery store I do make a detour home first, and then move on to the store just to avoid getting plastic bags. It adds maybe extra 15 minutes but I feel it's worth it. I do shopping on foot though, so no need to burn extra gas to do that.
Re:How Coca-Cola Undermines Plastic Recycling Efforts by WalterBright on Sunday October 20, 2019 @04:46PM (#21307004)
I've been tempted to, but managed to convince myself that was irrational.
Re:How Coca-Cola Undermines Plastic Recycling Efforts by ceejayoz on Sunday October 20, 2019 @02:05PM (#21305838)
> Bottle/can deposits predated curbside recycling, and vestigial regulations don't just disappear.

They're not necessarily vestigial. NY's been considering expanding bottle deposits to juice, energy drinks, coffee and tea sold in plastic or glass bottles (currently, it's mainly soda and water).

Re:How Coca-Cola Undermines Plastic Recycling Efforts by mindslight on Sunday October 20, 2019 @02:23PM (#21305994)
If the amount will still be a nickel, so that it only applies to the poor and the mathematically challenged, then I'd still call that vestigial.