News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:When Medical Debt Collectors Decide Who Gets Arrested by snagglegaggle on Saturday October 19, 2019 @02:34PM (#21299970)
I think this is completely fine. You'd rather be ruled by a credentialed class that could have opinions completely divorced from reality?

The law is supposed to be human and obvious. Any case that "requires" a JD and ten years experience is likely full of trash.

Re:When Medical Debt Collectors Decide Who Gets Arrested by alkonaut on Sunday October 20, 2019 @02:24AM (#21302561)
The answer to the first question is yes. I’d like my court cases to be decided by someone with legal training just like I’d like my surgery to be done by someone with training.
Re:When Medical Debt Collectors Decide Who Gets Arrested by ceejayoz on Monday October 21, 2019 @09:10AM (#21311835)
> You'd rather be ruled by a credentialed class that could have opinions completely divorced from reality?

There's a great New Yorker cartoon about this. https://www.newyorker.com/cartoon/a20630

Re:When Medical Debt Collectors Decide Who Gets Arrested by knolax on Sunday October 20, 2019 @04:29AM (#21302885)
If the law was human and obvious we wouldn't need lawyers in the first place. The system as it is is already complex enough that someone without a law degree would have great difficulty navigating it. Having uncredentialed judges won't make the laws simpler they'll just make an already dysfunctional system even worst.
Re:When Medical Debt Collectors Decide Who Gets Arrested by snagglegaggle on Sunday October 20, 2019 @03:34PM (#21306494)
There is no inherent need for lawyers; that one is required to navigate a legal system reflects poorly on it.