Re:Discontinuing Support for NSFW Imgur r/subsections Associ...
by loufe on Friday October 18, 2019 @06:09PM
(#21295464)
An honest question: Why and who in the payment space penalizes sites for allowing NSFW content? I can't understand why Visa, or Paypal would have moral grounds to block that content if they also process payment for strictly-porn sites.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Discontinuing Support for NSFW Imgur r/subsections Associ...
by Mindwipe on Friday October 18, 2019 @06:12PM
(#21295480)
Paypal doesn't process such payments.
Mastercard have a huge list of arbitrary rules.
Visa and Mastercard charge significantly extra to process adult payments.
Re:Discontinuing Support for NSFW Imgur r/subsections Associ...
by loufe on Friday October 18, 2019 @06:25PM
(#21295560)
Ah thanks for the clarification. Do you know under what pretense they charge the higher rates? I can imagine there is more fraud for adult payments, but would they also charge higher for gambling or other fraud prone payments in that case?
Re:Discontinuing Support for NSFW Imgur r/subsections Associ...
by ekimekim on Saturday October 19, 2019 @02:33AM
(#21297139)
One story I've heard is that adult content payments have a very high rate of chargeback, claiming it was fraud after the fact as a way of saving face when someone else (like a spouse) sees it in their transaction history.
But as you say, adult content isn't the only high-risk business but payment processors seem to care much more about it than others.
My guess is that it's just exactly what it looks like - a squeamishness to be associated with activities that culture targets as "non-respectable". "If people pay for porn with Paypal, then they'll think of Paypal as a porn payment provider and not want to use Paypal to pay for normal things".