> That problem was solved long ago, just reprocess it through breeder reactors and get even more energy!
That problem is far from solved, as you can see by the near-zero number of breeder reactors currently in activity around the world.
Breeder reactors are a proliferation nightmare. Any waste processing is an automatic proliferation issue.
If we reprocess-- the government should really do it because of proliferation concerns.
It takes a very specific design of breeder reactor to make weapons grade plutonium. Proliferation concerns are a red herring by anti-nuclear activists who intentionally conflate non-weapons grade plutonium with weapons grade to make ALL breeders sound dangerous.
"Weapons grade plutonium" obfuscates that you can make a nuclear weapon from non-weapons grade plutonium, albeit with an increased risk of only getting the fizzle yield.
Nuclear weapons that are "only" a couple kilotons are scary enough for me, kthx.
That problem was solved long ago, just reprocess it through breeder reactors and get even more energy!
The problem with the anti-nuclear lobby is that they block progress, then point at 50-year-old problems - that they have blocked implementing the solutions for - as current and unsolvable. They don’t actually want clean power. They want a reversion to a pre-industrial society, with themselves in charge.