Re:Dealing with China Isn’t Worth the Moral Cost
by NeedMoreTea on Thursday October 10, 2019 @07:42AM
(#21213295)
The notorious act of vandalism was as much an act against the monopoly of the East India Company than just the governor's stupid hard line approach. The daft thing is the tea boycott was dwindling. Dwindling until IIRC the tax was reduced and the East India Company got the monopoly they had been lobbying for in its place.
This provoked other British tea merchants to organise a campaign, publicity and letter writing to colonists to try and get the boycott going again.
It was the Company that then chose to send the four(?) ships to Boston.
T'was mostly the East India Company lit that touchpaper. Then, as you say, a series of government responses that turned moderates into radicals, and subjects of the Crown into Americans.
This provoked other British tea merchants to organise a campaign, publicity and letter writing to colonists to try and get the boycott going again.
It was the Company that then chose to send the four(?) ships to Boston.
T'was mostly the East India Company lit that touchpaper. Then, as you say, a series of government responses that turned moderates into radicals, and subjects of the Crown into Americans.