Re:Dealing with China Isn’t Worth the Moral Cost
by NeedMoreTea on Thursday October 10, 2019 @07:42AM
(#21213295)
The notorious act of vandalism was as much an act against the monopoly of the East India Company than just the governor's stupid hard line approach. The daft thing is the tea boycott was dwindling. Dwindling until IIRC the tax was reduced and the East India Company got the monopoly they had been lobbying for in its place.
This provoked other British tea merchants to organise a campaign, publicity and letter writing to colonists to try and get the boycott going again.
It was the Company that then chose to send the four(?) ships to Boston.
T'was mostly the East India Company lit that touchpaper. Then, as you say, a series of government responses that turned moderates into radicals, and subjects of the Crown into Americans.
Re:Dealing with China Isn’t Worth the Moral Cost
by riffraff on Thursday October 10, 2019 @01:06AM
(#21211091)
The big difference there would be the relative sizes of the two parties at play, and distance between them.
Re:Dealing with China Isn’t Worth the Moral Cost
by TheSpiceIsLife on Thursday October 10, 2019 @02:08AM
(#21211424)
And for the non-history-buffs, what country are you talking about?
Re:Dealing with China Isn’t Worth the Moral Cost
by smsm42 on Thursday October 10, 2019 @03:05AM
(#21211734)
I think the very notorious act of vandalism is this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party
After the Seven Years' War, a certain European country accidentally kicked off strife with its colonies which morphed into a struggle over legislative sovereignty. For a decade, this simmered until a particularly hard-nosed governor ending up allowing a confrontation to escalate into a very notorious act of vandalism, one that was nearly universally condemned, even on all sides of the conflict. In response, the government enacted a series of laws to punish not just the perpetrators but the entire colony. They hoped to turn moderates into loyalists, to better rein in neighboring radicals lest the same happen to them. Instead, they turned moderates into radicals, and furthermore caused the radicals to shift their demands from autonomy to outright independence, especially as the government chose to double down on their mistakes at every opportunity instead of reversing course hard and fast.