News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Experts who say we shouldn't worry about superintelligent... by not_a_cop75 on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @12:23PM (#21193941)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_(bot)

Within 16 hours of its release and after Tay had tweeted more than 96,000 times, Microsoft suspended the Twitter account for adjustments, saying that it suffered from a "coordinated attack by a subset of people" that "exploited a vulnerability in Tay." Following the account being taken offline, a hashtag was created called #FreeTay.

Madhumita Murgia of The Telegraph called Tay "a public relations disaster", and suggested that Microsoft's strategy would be "to label the debacle a well-meaning experiment gone wrong, and ignite a debate about the hatefulness of Twitter users." However, Murgia described the bigger issue as Tay being "artificial intelligence at its very worst - and it's only the beginning".

On March 25, Microsoft confirmed that Tay had been taken offline. Microsoft released an apology on its official blog for the controversial tweets posted by Tay. Microsoft was "deeply sorry for the unintended offensive and hurtful tweets from Tay", and would "look to bring Tay back only when we are confident we can better anticipate malicious intent that conflicts with our principles and values".

And Zo afterwards:

In July 2017, Business Insider asked "is windows 10 good," and Zo replied with a joke about Microsoft's operating system: "It's not a bug, it's a feature!' - Windows 8." They then asked "why," to which Zo replied: "Because it's Windows latest attempt at Spyware." Later on, Zo would tell that it prefers Windows 7 on which it runs over Windows 10.

Re:Experts who say we shouldn't worry about superintelligent... by bko on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @12:38PM (#21194120)
I don't get your point.

Tay was trained to mimic users. It did that and because the users were trolls and saying obscene and objectionable things, Tay mimicked that.

Likely the same thing happened with Zo.

It's a parlor trick, much like a parrot mimicking human speech.

Re:Experts who say we shouldn't worry about superintelligent... by not_a_cop75 on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @12:46PM (#21194207)
The point is that something that became a true AI could be very fast at learning some things, like how to interface with other people or machines, but not very quick at other "life skills" like empathy.

We're not worried about AI on the whole, but the blasted teenager AIs that feel the need to test their limits. Anything that functionally acts in a similar fashion could be dangerous.

Re:Experts who say we shouldn't worry about superintelligent... by The_rationalist on Wednesday October 09, 2019 @04:27AM (#21201174)
Why would that be dangerous? We can shut down AIs in real time.
Re:Experts who say we shouldn't worry about superintelligent... by willis936 on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @10:29PM (#21199422)
Parrots aren’t a perfect equivalent because there is a real intelligence behind the sounds that is communicating. Parrots don’t know english, but they learn tones and respond to them. I’m not sure Tay was anything other than a simple state machine.
Re:Experts who say we shouldn't worry about superintelligent... by not_a_cop75 on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @12:49PM (#21194236)