Re:Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream...
by x220 on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @03:30AM
(#21189665)
But nearly every large company in America engages in political discussion when they talk about diversity, feminism, and inclusion. I think that's a good thing, but it's clearly not the case that these companies shy away from making progressive statements.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream...
by mlang23 on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @03:37AM
(#21189710)
All they are doing is saying things which a certain audience wants to hear. Nobody really cares about inclusion or diversity. They just claim to do so, because in this day and age, they will benefit from doing so.
Re:Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream...
by bmarquez on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @03:41AM
(#21189738)
It doesn't cost large companies any money to make feel-good progressive political statements on social media.
However when it conflicts with their pocketbook, they stay quiet or internally oppose them (example: Zuckerberg trashing Warren for antitrust and privacy issues).
Re:Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream...
by chii on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @03:39AM
(#21189721)
That player has forced blizzard to appear as though they endorsed the protesters.
Being protesters for freedom, they ironically did not respect another (unrelated) entity's freedom to choose.
Re:Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream...
by x220 on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @03:46AM
(#21189774)
The freedom to oppress is no freedom at all