News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream Hong Kong protest. Parent comment

Re:Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream... by orisho on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @03:27AM (#21189649)
Not picking a side is not allowing political discussion, no matter who you (or they) perceive to be right. Coincidentally, this is also the choice that makes most sense to a corporation which stands to lose a lot from picking a side. Players will likely respond to sensationalist reporting of this case, but forget about it soon after, while the Chinese government is not gonna go easy on Blizzard picking the other side.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream... by x220 on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @03:30AM (#21189665)
But nearly every large company in America engages in political discussion when they talk about diversity, feminism, and inclusion. I think that's a good thing, but it's clearly not the case that these companies shy away from making progressive statements.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream... by mlang23 on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @03:37AM (#21189710)
All they are doing is saying things which a certain audience wants to hear. Nobody really cares about inclusion or diversity. They just claim to do so, because in this day and age, they will benefit from doing so.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream... by bmarquez on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @03:41AM (#21189738)
It doesn't cost large companies any money to make feel-good progressive political statements on social media.

However when it conflicts with their pocketbook, they stay quiet or internally oppose them (example: Zuckerberg trashing Warren for antitrust and privacy issues).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream... by chii on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @03:39AM (#21189721)
That player has forced blizzard to appear as though they endorsed the protesters.

Being protesters for freedom, they ironically did not respect another (unrelated) entity's freedom to choose.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream... by x220 on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @03:46AM (#21189774)
The freedom to oppress is no freedom at all
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream... by dang on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @03:50AM (#21189798)
Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments/flamebait to Hacker News?

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream... by ryanlol on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @06:03AM (#21190475)
There shouldn't be room for such cowardice to exist in this world.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blizzard bans player from Hearthstone following on-stream... by Isinlor on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @09:53AM (#21192298)
In other words they do pick a side - they side with Chinese government, because the communist party has a leverage on them.

But we have a leverage too!

If we manage to damage their brand and profit, they may decide that censorship is not to their benefit.

We need to be loud and clear - communism will not be tolerated. Otherwise, it will start to creep trough Blizzard and many other companies, and limit our freedoms too.

[ Parent | on HN ]